Biden Pollster Commits Massive Self-Own, Admits to Poll-Herding on Twitter

Politics Features Polling
Share Tweet Submit Pin
Biden Pollster Commits Massive Self-Own, Admits to Poll-Herding on Twitter

Earlier this week, you may have seen a Monmouth Poll that looked very different from other Democratic primary polls we’ve seen lately, in that Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren led presumptive frontrunner Joe Biden:

That created a big splash, not least among Biden supporters and establishment Democrats who really, really didn't want to see those results. The backlash was so loud that Monmouth was forced to release a statement essentially saying “these things happen.”

“In the end, we must put out the numbers we have,” Monmouth concluded, which is quite sensible. After all, you can't skew the numbers, and you can't simply throw out polls you don't like…right?

Not so fast, says John Anzalone, a partner at ALG Polling, which has polled for Obama, Hillary Clinton, and—per his Twitter bio—Joe Biden. For Anzalone, the statement wasn't good enough. This one's screenshotted for the inevitable moment when he deletes it:

Screen Shot 2019-08-28 at 1.17.55 PM.png

“When our firm comes out of the field and we believe we have an outlier we shit can the numbers and redo the poll at our expense. Period,” Anzalone said.


That's called poll-herding! A number of respondents tried to point this out:

Now, Anzalone works for a company that polls for individual clients, so this might not exactly be “unethical,” since his results don’t go public. But it’s certainly stupid, and if I were Joe Biden or any of his other clients, I’d be distinctly worried about trusting any results he gave me. As several users pointed out, he polled for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and many of the polls associated with that race were off. Is Anzalone saying that it would have been okay to discard the polls he didn’t like so that he only presented Clinton with good news?

That aside, the idea that Monmouth should discard any polls that don’t conform to other polls is madness, and presents a slippery slope argument that would compel polling outlets to make ideological decisions, rather than preserving the integrity of their data. Polls are meant to reflect reality, not to influence it.